eBook and Traditional Publishing

Spectacle Publishing Media Group, LLC

Halloween Catch Up

Some Scary Links
Some Scary Books
 
  1. On Monsters: An Unnatural History of Our Worst Fears
    I took a class from the author of this book, great professor and a gifted writer. Professor Asma’s insight into the human condition is almost supernatural. As he walks you through the various culturally constructed terrors of modern society, he expertly points out the folly and inconsistencies in each of those superstitions.
  2. Malleus Malificarum
    We’re not going to link to this book since you can get various versions from a dozen sources ranging from free to well past not-free. This is the original Witch Hunter’s Manual, written by a pair of charlatans.
  3. Frankenstein
    Considered a classic of horror literature, one might consider the deeper meanings in this troublesome tale. Is this a Luddite’s warning about science unchecked or a challenge to the existence of God? Literature professors worldwide still waste undergraduate’s time with this heady and unresolvable debate. But if you haven’t read it, you need to.
  4. World War Z
    If you haven’t read this one by now, you need to throw off that rock you’re hiding under and get with the program. This well researched, cleverly constructed historical account of the Zombie Apocalypse is true a modern horror classic. The audio-book version, though abridged, stars the voice talents of Allen Alda, Mark Hamill, Henry Rollins and a whole slew of other professional actors.

The Zombie Thing

Since it’s the season for horror writing (though I think true Zombie aficionados are always alert and wary for the possibility of an undead uprising, regardless of the time of year) I thought it’d be a good time to talk about a tidal wave of a trend in fiction. I’m guessing if you’re any sort of Zombie fan, you’ve read The Zombie Survival Guide and World War Z by Max Brooks. These two books, so well researched and cleverly assembled helped to make the concept of a species-ending epidemic or plague, very real, bringing them close to home at the same time, viewing such terrific events from a cool and clinical perspective. This perspective added a level of plausibility that the genre had lacked before. Max Brooks two books are clear, concise, informative and not the blood-spattered, hysterical screaming gore fests many of us have come to associate with the genre.

 

But if we jump back a little further, I want to say 2002, there’s a film written by Alex Garland and directed by Danny Boyle that I think not only revitalized the genre, but sent it spiraling off into new directions in both literature and cinema. 28 Days Later is the tale of a virus outbreak that spreads rapidly from person to person, causing not cannibalistic hunger as we’ve come to expect from zombies, but simple, unchecked rage. This infection forces a loss of reason and freewill upon its victims, essentially turning them into mindless killers (zombies.)So far, we’re not seeing major differences in the plot; same disease vector, same results, panicked civilization, trains are no longer on time, et cetera. Then it hits you right in the face: these zombies can run. Now only can they run, but they’re fast!

This simple change in an otherwise clichéd monster’s behavior not only made them actually frightening again, but increased the plausibility of the whole event, not to mention revitalizing a dead (heh) sub-genre of horror. Zombies create the perfect union of post-apocalyptic settings.

 

Opportunities for characters are limitless. For example, how would survivors behave knowing there were no consequences for their actions? Without law and order, who decides right and wrong? Perhaps more to the point, who is stop those who choose to do wrong? This setting provides for limitless exploration of ethics and morality plays. As long as your internal cosmology is consistent, your plausibility remains high and the fictional elements are not even doubted.

 

AMC’s The Walking Dead is a good example of this. The situation is internally consistent – the laws of physics and the cause-effect pattern of the zombie infection is consistent. In situations where there is doubt, the writers take special care to place just enough exposition dialogue to allow the audience to follow along – this is done in what that seems internally consistent with the logic process of the character. So, when the lines are spoken, it’s more like they’re thinking aloud or mumbling to themselves. Very nice technique.

 

If a writer took some of these processes, these techniques and incorporate them into their own work, the results could be amazing. Something trite and dusty becomes at once fresh and new.  I read a short story in an anthology called Season of Rot, there were a few zombies with glowing green eyes. This signified that they were intelligent hunters, almost like a leader-caste among the undead; an uncommon variation, if not entirely original. This twist nonetheless made the story different. Sometimes that’s all it takes.

 

One more thing I want to point out to would be zombie writers – the story is not about zombies. It never has been. The story has always been about the survivors. The human element in a world where the most reliable and basic fact of existence has become incomprehensible. This epic level change in reality is nothing but sheer, raw story potential. In the original Night of the Living Dead, the template for just about every other horror movie made since is established: a band of survivors overcomes internal conflicts in an attempt to simply stay alive. In most cases, they lose what they were desperately trying to protect (their lives, one another, et cetera).  Night of the Living Dead focuses on the people trapped in the farm-house. They slowly reveal their own histories through necessary, not extraneous exposition. This next part should go without saying, but since we’re here and you’re still reading it’s prudent to mention that the back stories of these characters are not the  stories of secret agents or assassins or super-heroes. They’re just people. In most cases, these quite flawed people are struggling to overcome their own inadequacies, their own fears and grief in a very hostile environment. There is no reason for zombie films to be flat or trite. There is no reason not to crank up the drama, the visceral human experience to eleven.

Scary S@*#

Halloween is just around the corner. Or maybe it’s hiding in the closet or under the bed. It might be sliding from shadow to shadow as you wander wearily to the bathroom in the middle of the night. My bet is that it was watching you from the window, probably ever since you got home this evening. Did you lock the doors up? Do you dare go check?

Whatever your relationship with Halloween, no one dislikes a good horror story. Everyone likes to be scared. It’s fun when you’re a kid, it’s fun when you’re an adult. The question becomes “what is scary?” There’s no shortage of Stephen Kings and Dean R. Koontzs and Clive Barkers, but is this stuff scary anymore? How many times can King tell a story about a haunted car? Three to my best estimation (Maximum Overdrive, Christine and I’m sure there’s one more…) The trend in “scary” has changed from that tingling uneasiness you get when walking in the woods alone at sunset, to scenes of gruesome torture and mutilation. Mutilation is not horror. Mutilation is a car accident or an artillery shell. Torture is not horror; it is a debased form of intelligence gathering.

So what is scary? Well, it’s not vampires anymore. They’re too clever and charming, their fashion sense is overwhelming and with such perfect smiles, how could they instill fear in anything? Werewolves too, have fallen to the wayside on the highway of terror. Ghosts, while unsettling for most are recycled and trite. Zombies and some of the more gruesome undead seem to be holding out cultural attention. I personally have read a dozen books that treat the topic with excellent insight as well as innovation. Ever since the 2003 release of 28 Days Later, we’ve seen the Zombie sub-genre blossom like a yellow-musk creeper in corpse pile (old school D&D reference anyone?). Now that zombies are fast, can run and chase you, and want nothing more than to devour you, to eat you alive while you struggle vainly to protect your exposed flesh from their rotting, chipped teeth, they are a bit more frightening.

The denizens of the underworld, demons and devils, always occupy a special place, a shadowy corner in the recesses of the minds of the pious. But is it the threat of eternal damnation or the threat of a being whose very existence is anathema to your continued survival that is scary? I guess we should check in with William Peter Blatty for that one.

When I talk with writers about horror, about mustering up strange fears that often the audience didn’t even know it had, I always start with a conversation about what the writer finds frightening. Serial Killers? Ghosts? Snakes? Once that determination is made, I ask them when they realized they were afraid of this thing. Sometimes they don’t know, and that’s okay. Sometimes they know exactly why and what happened. Often it’s a situation that would scare anyone. There is the heart of their horror story, I tell them.

Like all fiction, the drama and tension needs to be ratcheted up, wound as tight as possible without breaking the wire. Not all at once (or maybe, I mean if you can pull it off, right?) but a gradual increase of psychological pressure on the characters will seep into the reader. Tension and anxiety make even the most basic and normally ignored fears seem like massive spiders lurking on the ceiling of the room you just entered, or moving silently up behind you, each one of their lifeless, glassy, eight eyes seeing you not as human being, but as prey…

 

Where was I?

Oh yeah, tension. Beyond tension, there must be an element of the surreal; nothing overt, but everyday people don’t find out that Michael Meyers (the one with the knife, not the ogre one) is their brother. The situation can start out normal, in fact should, but we’re not scared or at least less so in familiar surroundings. So move your characters from their comfort zones and your audience cares about them, they will travel to that strange place with them.

Many would argue that the final ingredient in any horror experience would be some blood and perhaps guts. I disagree. A splash of blood for color perhaps, but true terror, real, deep, hind-brain fear can paralyze the audience in a well-lit room or a sunny day. Don’t forget to invoke the senses. You’ve put a beloved character into a surreal series of events in a strange and disturbing place, so be sure to remind us that. Does the wind smell like decayed leaves, something left over from autumn, a strange reek that clings to the sickly trees? Is the moonlight piss-yellow or alabaster white? Is it my footsteps making that crunching sound? Or is it someone else’s? How does it feel to be shaking, sweating, hungry and tired in blistering heat or cold rainy wind? What are those strange noises? Are they… just birds?

Scare us (if you can)!

Spectacle Publishing is looking for some terrifying fiction to publish for Halloween. Give us your best monster stories; urban fantasy, terror, horror, vampires, ghosts, goblins, spiders, bats, werewolves and high-school teachers with long black fingernails and that thing growing on their noses!

What we’re looking for specifically:

  • Full length novels (70,000 words or more)
  • Horror/Monster fiction
  • Character driven, immersive settings with fresh plots
  • No clichés (unless they are damn clever)

Send us only your very best work. We want to publish your work, but we also want it to be successful. Our editors take great pains to make sure your work gets a fair review. If they like your work, they work with you, becoming a creative partner, getting your work in the possible shape for success. Don’t be afraid. Really. What are you waiting for? The Query Monster lives here.